If any work of any civilian will not finish in the prescribed time, in any government agency, Lokpal will enforce economic punishment on at fault agents who will grant as reimbursement to the complainant. So, People could set about Lokpal if your identification or voter or ration card is not being made or if the policeman is not listing your complain or any further work is not being finished in the prescribed time.
Citizen could furthermore report any case of corruption to Lokpal like poor-quality roads or ration being siphoned off has been assembled or panchayat capital being siphoned off. Lokpal will have to entire its enquiries in a year. Test will be over into next one year, and the faulty will proceed to prison within two years. Will not the Government assign corruption and feeble persons as Lokpal members? That will not likely on them because its constituents will be chosen by referees, people and legal administration and not by political leaders, through a clear and participatory process.
What, if some agent in Lokpal becomes corrupt? The whole functioning of Lokpal or Lokayukta will be totally transparent. Any accusation contrary to any agent of Lokpal will enquiry, and the agent brushed aside within two months.
What will occur to live opposing corruption authorities? Anti-corruption agency of CBI and departmental vigilance will merge into Lokpal. Lokpal will have entire forces and mechanism to individually enquiry and prosecute any agent, referee or politician. It will be the obligation of the Lokpal to supply defense to those who are being victimized for lifting their voice contrary to corruption.
Like this: Like Loading Related Posts. Tags: India. Government bill excludes judges and junior officials below Group A. The Jan Lokpal bill include ministers, MPs for any action outside Parliament, and Group A officers and equivalent of the government, includes a sitting Prime Minister, any act of an MP in respect of a speech or vote in Parliament which is now protected by Article of the Constitution ,judges, all government officials.
Jan Lokpal excludes NGOs. Second difference is the composition The Lokpal bill has a chairperson and up to 8 members; at least half the members must have a judicial background. The Jan Lokpal bill has a chairperson and 10 members, of which 4 have a judicial background. Third difference is process of selecting the members The Lokpal Bill has a simpler process.
The selection will be made by a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the leaders of Opposition in both Houses of Parliament, a Supreme Court judge, a high court chief justice, an eminent jurist and an eminent person in public life. The selection committee may, at its discretion, appoint a search committee to shortlist candidates.
The Jan Lokpal has a two stage process. A search committee will shortlist potential candidates. The search committee will have 10 members; five of these would have retired as Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner or Comptroller and Auditor General; they will select the other five from civil society. The Lok Pal chairperson and members will be selected from this shortlist by a selection committee.
Fourth difference is the qualification of members The Lokpal Bill requires the judicial member to be a Supreme Court judge or a high court chief justice. For other members, the government Bill requires at least 25 years experience in anti-corruption policy, public administration, vigilance or finance.
The Jan Lokpal requires a judicial member to have held judicial office for 10 years or been a high court or Supreme Court advocate for 15 years. The JLP has a lower age limit of 45 years, and disqualifies anyone who has been in government service in the previous two years.
Fifth difference is removal of members The Lok pal Bill permits the president to make a reference to the Supreme Court for an inquiry, followed by removal if the member is found to be biased or corrupt.
The reference may be made by the president a on his own, a on a petition signed by MPs or c on a petition by a citizen if the President is then satisfied that it should be referred.
The President may also remove any member for insolvency, infirmity of mind or body, or engaging in paid employment. In the Jan Lokpal Bill the removal of members starts with a complaint by any person to the Supreme Court.
If the court finds misbehavior, infirmity of mind or body, insolvency or paid employment, it may recommend his removal to the President. Sixth difference is the offences covered by the bills The Lokpal Bill deals only with offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Jan Lokpal Bill covers offences under the prevention of corruption act and also offences by public servants under the Indian Penal Code, victimization of whistleblowers and repeated violation of citizen's charter.
Seventh difference is the investigation process The Lokpal Bill provides for an investigation wing in the government bill. Eighth difference is the process of prosecution The government Bill provides for a prosecution wing of the Lok Pal. In the government Bill, the Lok Pal may initiate prosecution in a special court. A copy of the report is to be sent to the competent authority.
No prior sanction is required. Ninth difference is process of grievance redressal The Lokpal Bill does not deal with grievance redressal. The Jan Lokpal Bill deals with grievance redressal of citizens, in addition to the process for prosecuting corruption cases. It requires every public authority to publish citizen's charters listing its commitments to citizens.
Anna Hazare's fast seeking the acceptance of the Jan Lokpal Bill, have shaken the government. Political parties have woken up to the depth of feeling against corruption. The snowballing protests are seen to be against corruption. Obviously, the public are fed up with the day-to-day harassment they face. To put this in perspective, it is important to understand the benefits to society of tackling the huge black economy in India.
The anti-corruption campaigns that has brought politicians and businessmen under the scanner, especially their links with the builder community being exposed in recent scams, have got the real estate sector worried. A number of industry insiders and sleuths have confirmed that the flow of unaccounted money in the system, a big source of funding for the sector facing funds crunch, will get disrupted.
An unhealthy nexus between builders and politicians as well as businessmen is the source of a considerable amount of black money in the system, say industry watchers. These politicians and businessmen are believed to use real estate to park black money.
Some people argue that the black economy also generates jobs and production. For instance, they argue that a lot of goods are bought in the market using black incomes, and that leads to increase in production and employment.
They argue that the black economy generates informal sector employment and helps the poor. Some go to the extent of arguing that India escaped the worst effects of the global recession in , and the economy only slowed down, because a large amount of black money was floating around, which generated additional demand. Some justify bribes as speed money that enables work to be done faster.
There is some truth in all this. Yet, it can be shown that the ill-effects of the black economy far outweigh its beneficial effects. Think of bribe as speed money.
In order to extract a bribe, the bureaucracy first slows down work and harasses the public. If work was automatically done, why would anyone pay bribes Thus, the system has to be made inefficient so that those who can afford to pay can get their work done quickly but the rest continue to suffer.
The administration becomes rundown because instead of working efficiently it is looking into ways of making speed money. This paved way to middlemen culture. The personal approach to officers, hardly happen in the routine manner. The corrupt need the middleman to insulate themselves from direct public contact and find it a convenient arrangement. Much of the black economy in India is like digging holes and filling them.
That is, one digs a hole during the day and then another fills it up at night; the next day there is zero output but two salaries are paid. This is activity without productivity. An example is of poorly made roads that get washed away or become pot-holed with every rain and need repeated repairs. Thus, instead of new roads coming up, much of the budget allocation is spent on maintenance. Teachers may not teach properly in class so that students have to go for tuitions.
Not only families have to pay extra but the students find learning to be insipid and lose interest. This affects their creativity and future. In most instances, the hearing in a particular case lasts just a few minutes. The next date, weeks or months away, is announced, and they go back home. Not only is justice delayed inordinately, but time is lost and expenses are incurred on lawyers' fees, travel, and so on.
Cases that could be resolved in a few months go on for years, multiplying costs. The expense of delayed justice is both direct and indirect. Delay is often a result of the impact of the black economy. Honest people who lose hope start resorting to other means, which dents the notion of social justice and weakens society. This cost cannot be calculated in monetary terms but it is significant.
Because of the growing black economy, policies fail both at the macro-level and the micro-level. Planning or monetary policy or fiscal policies do not achieve the desired results because of the existence of a substantial black economy. Targets for education, health, drinking water and so on are not achieved because expenditures do not mean outcomes.
This was under the scenario of confrontations between the Centre and the State Government of Delhi. Subsequently, the AAP chief also lashed out at the central government for not allowing them to work for the interest of Delhi people.
Returning of the bill gave birth to fresh issues between the Central government and AAP government in the Delhi. The AAP leader accused the central government of not allowing the bills. The major bills included in these 14 bills were:. It was passed in June The important bill Jan Lokpal is an anti-corruption bill which sought an approval for appointing independent body for fair investigations of the corruption charges.
Yet another important bill is related to the practices of the private schools of Delhi. However, the Central Government claimed the bills are not approved as they did not obtain Lt. The central government also claimed that the bills had legal loopholes.
The controversial Jan Lokpal Bill is an anti-corruption bill. It was drawn by the civil activists seeking that corruption cases should be investigated by an independent body. This bill also wants improvements in the earlier bills of Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill of The Jan Lokpal is directed to curb corruption, help citizens, and protect the people involved in revealing corruption.
0コメント